British funeral director John O’Looney: deaths skyrocketed ‘300%’ after COVID vaccine

Rair Foundation reports:

“I’ve never seen a death rate like it in 15 years.” – John O’Looney

Statements from a courageous funeral director went viral in September after he shared observations about those who died in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

John O’Looney, director of Milton Keynes Family Funeral Services, continues to crush the narrative in an exclusive RAIR Foundation USA interview. After O’Looney spoke out last month, “about 65 professionals from within the industry in various positions” have approached him with similar stories about the nature of the dead arriving at funeral homes.

Deaths Before and After Vaccine

In America, assisted living home deaths marked a huge amount, if not the majority, of coronavirus deaths, as reported at RAIR. But it is not just about elderly patients being more susceptible to the coronavirus, there is deep speculation that deaths of the elderly could have been prevented, and may have been deliberate.

John O’Looney and his colleagues noticed that for the first year, there were no surplus deaths at all and if anything, fewer deaths. Those who died supposedly from the coronavirus, O’Looney asserts, appear to have succumbed to a drug called Midazolam given to nursing home residents.

The funeral home director is not alone in his suspicion.

But after the vaccine was introduced to his area in January, O’Looney said that the calls made to his funeral home soared, going up “300 percent”. “I’ve never seen a death rate like it in 15 years,” he said. “Initially, [the deaths were] all exclusively care homes,” O’Looney said. But after the roll out of the mRNA injection, the deaths were no longer exclusively from nursing homes, and the ages of the dead varied significantly.

“I’ve got a 32-year-old, a 33-year-old and a 28-year-old in my care at the moment,” O’Looney explained as an example. “They’re all jab recipients and they all died unexpectedly and suddenly,” he continued.

Read the full article and watch the video of the funeral director at Rair Foundation.

3 thoughts on “British funeral director John O’Looney: deaths skyrocketed ‘300%’ after COVID vaccine

  1. thanks John for your advices and information. I hope the following information may spark your interests:

    Is there to be a future?

    FYI. Something needs to be done. Please circulate Your views are valuable!

    Although this below suggestion is Australian based it can be easily modified to suit any country.


    23rd November 2021.

    In the last several months protest rallies around Australia have steadily increased in frequency and attendance figures. Although mainstream media attempts to pretend most of these protesters are ratbags, the evidence shows that is not true. These are citizens who are exercising their constitutional rights to be informed on the efficacy of the experimental drugs being forced on their children and them selves (mandated) against their better judgement.
    A meeting can be a half dozen people or several hundred thousand. Whatever number there are attending any protest, little is achieved unless there are decisions agreed to by the members attending and directions set for the meeting’s energy to be focused upon practical outcomes. I have heard it said that several hundred thousand people have attended meetings around Australia. A meeting without an outcome is a great deal of wasted energy. Unfortunately the people forcing these experimental drugs on people who don’t want them have not got the message and in my opinion there comes a time when the next message is civil disobedience,

    SUGGESTIONS: It is routine in an organised meeting to set objectives of the meeting such as:
    1. A resolution of those attendees describing the issues to be addressed.EG:
    a) This meeting endorses the inalienable authority of the Australian Constitution.
    b) This meeting rejects Vaccine mandates
    c) This meeting rejects any interference in the reasonable continuance of any citizen’s work or business,
    d) This meeting rejects withdrawal of civil liberty of citizens against their reasonable wishes,
    e) This meeting calls upon the Federal Government to enact a Bill of Rights for Australian Citizens.
    2. Implementation of the meeting resolutions; a) Who shall be the recipient? b) When will it be implemented? c) Who shall deliver the resolution?
    3. Follow up meeting to be?
    4. Election of representatives?
    5. Objectives of the organisation.
    6. Name of the organisation.
    7. Funding.
    8. Call for volunteers to work and manage the new organisation,
    9. Affiliation with other similar organisations, such as like-minded citizens in other locations.
    61 0409574989

  2. Miten voikaan olla noin totuudelle sokeita tyyppejä jopa tuall eduskunnassakin. Vetävätkö ne täysin tietoisesti jotain roolia, vai eivätkö ne ihan aikuisten oikeesti nää mitä ympärillä tapahtuu. Täysin naurettavaa maskipelleilyä koko tämän pandemiahuijauksen ajan.
    Samaan aikaa on nähtävissä ihmisiä, jotka eivät ole ottaneet näitä piikkejä, eivätkä ole käyttäneet maskeja ja ovat silti olleet täysin terveinä koko tämän ajan..

Leave a Reply